storyhdr.gif (5510 bytes)

Sunday, June 24, 2001

Despite depravations during war, Sarajevans continue enjoying art


Ivana Avramovic / Stars and Stripes

Mustafa Skopljak created this sculpture during the Bosnian war out of glass that was shattered during the shelling. The sculptor says he had no shortage of material.

Seeking comfort on a cold night during the siege of Sarajevo, Tvrtko Kulenovic pulled from the shelves of his substantial private library the hardback edition of the complete works of William
Shakespeare.

Then he stuffed the thick volume of the Bard’s sonnets and plays into his stove and set it ablaze.

“It did for some time provide heat,” recalls Kulenovic, director of the National Theater in Sarajevo, the capital of Bosnia and Herzegovina. He smiled slightly at the memory.

While Bosnian Serb snipers and artillery reduced life in Sarajevo to a daily battle against cold, hunger and fear for more than 1,000 days from 1992 to 1995, Sarajevans often turned to the arts for solace, and not just as fuel for the evening fire.

Stage productions flourished. Galleries held exhibits, often displaying new art inspired by the war. Musicians held concerts.

Painters painted and sculptors sculpted even as shells tore apart the city and sniper bullets mowed down men, women and children.

And if there was art to enjoy, Kulenovic says the people of Sarajevo braved the dangers to find it.

“They took the back streets, streets that could not be seen by the enemy,” he says. “But they did come.”

They sat in cold theaters to watch a ballet or hear chamber music and visited poorly lit galleries to gaze at paintings or sculptures or photographs.

“At least for an hour or two, you felt normal. You felt the world was as it used to be,” says Kulenovic, also a professor of literature at the University of Sarajevo.

Meliha Husedjinovic, director of the National Gallery, says, “I think that for survival, [art] was one of the most important things.”


Ivana Avramovic / Stars and Stripes

Mustafa Skopljak, an art professor at the Academy of Fine Arts at the University of Sarajevo, paints in his office. For two years during the war, while he was displaced from his apartment, he slept and worked in the office.

For some people, she says, the ability to create or enjoy art was “more
important than to find bread for the day.”

Soon after the war began in spring 1992, the curtain went up on the
Sarajevo War Theater.

“It represented a real spiritual refuge,” says Biljana Vujic, who works with the theater, which is still active and still known by its original name.

On Sept. 6, 1992, the first production of the new theater opened, a play called “The Shelter” by Safet Plakalo, one of the theater’s founders and its current director.

Before the end of the war, the theater’s reputation had spread. It actually toured Europe in 1994 and 1995 with “The Shelter.”

Since it began, it has been in continuous production.Vujic admits that some people think the name should be changed, but she insists, “We are used to it and recognized by it.”

As the shells fell, artists found a new inspiration. One photographer held an exhibition of photographs of the telltale marks left by exploding shells —

Sarajevo roses, they are called — in streets glistening with rain. “A wonderful exhibition,” Kulenovic says.

Several artists with similar ideas eventually gained international attention when their work toured under the title “Sarajevo: Witnesses to Existence.” They included the war in their art.

Among them was Mustafa Skopljak, a professor of sculpture at the University of Sarajevo’s Academy of Fine Arts.


Ivana Avramovic / Stars and Stripes

The National Gallery in Sarajevo, the capital of Bosnia and Herzegovina, presents exhibits from all over the world.

“To this destruction of the war, I reacted with construction,” Skopljak says in his office at the academy, where he lived and slept for two years when his apartment was destroyed.

His office is decorated with his work. Most eye-catching are the conical shapes formed from pieces of glass broken by the Bosnian Serb shells.

People thought him crazy, he says, as he went about gathering the glass. There was no shortage. Virtually every window in the city was blown out
during the war.

His art also incorporated the twisted metal, broken bricks and smashed tiles from shelled buildings.

“I had enough material,” he says a bit sarcastically. “The shells prepared everything for me.”

He and other artists socialized, he says. They planned and put on plays and exhibitions and films.

People came, he says, because “ people had had enough of basements, hiding.”

The performances and exhibitions gave people a chance to gather and talk. The women even wore makeup and their finest dresses.

“The question was whether they would be able to go back home,” he says.


Ivana Avramovic / Stars and Stripes

The Sarajevo War Theater — Ratni Teatar in the local language — began in 1992 and is still producing plays more than five years after the end of the civil war. A refuge for actors and theater-goers during the war, the company has achieved stature around the world.

In postwar Sarajevo, art has enjoyed mixed success. For example, the
Sarajevo Film Festival has gained worldwide recognition and attracts celebrities from Hollywood each year.

Also, the city will host about 1,000 young artists from around the globe in late July at the 10th Biennial of the Young Artists of Europe and the Mediterranean.

But like the rest of the country, the arts suffer from a lack of money. Many of the artists and performers who left during the war have not returned.

“They got jobs and didn’t come back,” says Kulenovic.

Only 18 ballet dancers remain in a troupe that had more than 40 before the war. Of more than 30 actors who worked in the city before the war, only 16 remain.

“There is no money. There is no prosperity,” says Kulenovic. “That is the problem. People are not the problem.”

Husedjinovic says many artists have left because there is no money for them to remain in Sarajevo. The most talented have accepted scholarships to study abroad, often after their work attracted attention in the spotlight shown on Sarajevo by the war.

Skopljak, too, admits that many of the best artists are leaving, but he doesn’t begrudge their decisions.

“There is no money. It’s hard to sell a sculpture,” he says. “But we (who stay) still work. I feel bad for the students who have to leave. I see that they’re successful outside in the world.”

He jokes that their departure is part of a plan to build at “Greater Bosnia,” a reference to the plans for a Greater Serbia that helped fuel the Balkan wars of the 1990s.

The National Gallery is caught in a bureaucratic pickle. According to the Dayton peace accord that stopped the war, the local cantons — sort of like
U.S. counties — are in charge of cultural funding.

But the gallery was state-owned in the days of Yugoslavia and has not completed its move to the private sector. The gallery now lives on borrowed funds, says Husedjinovic.

“We get means only to maintain the building and minimum wages,” she says. “We do searches for sponsors.”

Recently, the National Gallery showed the work of a French artist with the help of the French cultural ministry.

There is hope here that events like the film festival and others will bring prosperity to art once again in Sarajevo. But in a country where unemployment is rampant, gallery exhibits and stage productions might seem unimportant.

Yet this is Sarajevo, where even a war could not stop artists from creating or people from enjoying the art.

Skopljak recalled a proverb that claims that when cannons are firing, the muses are silent.

“In Sarajevo,” he says, “the muses were not silent.”


Back to June stories
Page Two news roundup
Stories from May, 2001
Stories from April, 2001
Stories from March, 2001
Stories from February,2001
Stories from January, 2001
Stories from December, 2000
Stories from November, 2000
Stories from October, 2000
Stories from August and September, 2000
Stories from June and July, 2000
Home